Mental health consequences of isolation of patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative effect on the mental health on the population. It is unknown if the different types of patient isolation affect them equally. The objective of the study was to determine if the effect on the psychological discomfort caused by the isolation of the population with COVID-19 in a hotel supervised by health professionals was different compared with those who were isolated at home. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 during the first pandemic wave in Barcelona, consecutively selected from the Primary Care lists. A telephone survey was carried out to collect information about mental health in patients who were isolated in a hotel compared to those isolated at their homes. Descriptive statistics were performed and the study variables were analyzed using mean and standard deviation, count (percentage), Chi-square test, and Student's t-test. Logistic regression models were carried out selecting frustration and anger/irritability as response variables. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients included, 45 (50.6%) were isolated at their homes and 44 (49.4%) at the hotel. Frustration was identified in 48.3% and irritability in 29.2% of the most patients. Most of those who presented frustration were between 45 and 65 years old, while 50% of those who felt irritability were younger. Multivariate models confirmed that patients isolated at home showed a higher risk of frustration (Odds ratio 4,12;95% Confidence interval 1,60-11,49) and irritability (Odds ratio 3,81;95% Confidence interval 1,32-12,10), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients isolated at home show a higher risk of presenting feelings of frustration and irritability than isolated patients in supervised hotels.

Covid-19 and NETs

Introduction: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have recently been linked to an important role in the pathogenesis of Covid-19. Method(s): Prospective observational study of 91 hospitalized patients. We studied longitudinally the viral phase, early inflammatory and late, and the 4 most specific components of NETs: cell free-DNA (cfDNA), MPO-DNA and NE-DNA complexes and citrullinated Histone 3 (citH3). Result(s): We observed elevated levels vs controls of MPO-DNA and NE-DNA complexes and cfDNA at admission and in the 3 phases of the disease. CitH3 was elevated from the early inflammatory phase onwards. There was a significant correlation in survivors (r=0.798) and in all severity degrees between MPO and NE and between cfDNA and H3 cit (r=0.3), but not in the rest of combinations among the 4, nor in dead patients. We did not observe any correlation in any group between MPO or NE with citH3. There was an increase of only cfDNA levels in more severe patients. The area under the ROC curve for critical severity and mortality was high for cfDNA (0.7327 and 0.7482) and much poorer for the other 3 NETs markers. Conclusion(s): -We found evidence of neutrophil activation of NETs components in Covid-19, during the 3 phases of the disease, but without a clear relationship with severity and mortality. -cfDNA was related to severity and mortality, and its sources appeared to be more related to tissue damage than to NETs -The best correlation between them was MPO-NE, and these more neutrophil-specific markers reflect probably better NET formation. NETs role has maybe been overestimated using other less specific markers.

[Mental health consequences of isolation of patients with COVID-19.]

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative effect on the mental health on the population. It is unknown if the different types of patient isolation affect them equally. The objective of the study was to determine if the effect on the psychological discomfort caused by the isolation of the population with COVID-19 in a hotel supervised by health professionals was different compared with those who were isolated at home. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 during the first pandemic wave in Barcelona, consecutively selected from the Primary Care lists. A telephone survey was carried out to collect information about mental health in patients who were isolated in a hotel compared to those isolated at their homes. Descriptive statistics were performed and the study variables were analyzed using mean and standard deviation, count (percentage), Chi-square test, and Student's t-test. Logistic regression models were carried out selecting frustration and anger/irritability as response variables. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients included, 45 (50.6%) were isolated at their homes and 44 (49.4%) at the hotel. Frustration was identified in 48.3% and irritability in 29.2% of the most patients. Most of those who presented frustration were between 45 and 65 years old, while 50% of those who felt irritability were younger. Multivariate models confirmed that patients isolated at home showed a higher risk of frustration (Odds ratio 4,12;95% Confidence interval 1,60-11,49) and irritability (Odds ratio 3,81;95% Confidence interval 1,32-12,10), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients isolated at home show a higher risk of presenting feelings of frustration and irritability than isolated patients in supervised hotels.